![]() We’ve had the ability to focus on doing what we think are the right things over a multiyear period, instead of just having to be beholden to the quarter-to-quarter demands that a lot of public companies have to struggle with.īut I think some of the most devastating critique is not around substance in terms of what the companies do. And then throughout, we’ve just been able to focus on the right things over the long term, whether it was going through our IPO and focusing on building the right mobile products instead of just focusing on monetizing and putting ads in quickly. We wouldn’t even be here if I didn’t have control. I think, historically, it’s been very valuable … In 2006, when Yahoo wanted to buy our company, I probably would’ve been fired, and we would have sold the company. It’s a concentration within the company, concentration within a person. And within that, the fact that I have voting control of the company really does focus a lot of the attention on that, that concentration. MZ: I think a lot of the concerns are that people think that our company is very powerful. And we’re committed to doing that well, and part of doing that well is not just building the internal tools and showing up and saying, “Hey, we think we’ve solved this,” but addressing and meeting with all the regulators up front, hearing their concerns, hearing what they think we should be doing, making sure other folks in the consortium are handling this appropriately. We already focus a lot on real identity, across especially Facebook, so there’s even more that we need to do in order to have this kind of a product. There are a lot of requirements on knowing who your customers are. There’s a lot of important issues that need to be dealt with in preventing money laundering, preventing financing of terrorists and people who the different governments say you can’t do business with. Finance is a very heavily regulated space. here’s a product, your app got updated, now you can start buying Libras and sending them around.” We want to make sure. So not just show up and say, “Alright, here we’re launching this. When harmful content surfaces on them, it raises complex moderation questions for domain hosts and web infrastructure providers - a separate set of powerful companies that have completely different business models from Facebook.But part of what we’re trying to do overall on these big projects now that touch very socially important aspects of society is have a more consultative approach. ![]() Instead, they twist and exploit the open internet’s positive ability to connect like-minded people. ![]() These sites aren’t primarily driven by algorithms or profit motives. Many of the deadliest far-right killers were apparently incubated on small forums: Christchurch mosque killer Brenton Tarrant on 8chan Oregon mass shooter Chris Harper-Mercer on 4chan Tree of Life Synagogue killer Robert Bowers on Gab and Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik on white supremacist sites including Stormfront, a 23-year-old hate site credited with inspiring scores of murders. Radicalization doesn’t just happen on Facebook and YouTube either. As Alexis Madrigal notes, condemning the platforms together comes “uncomfortably close to admitting that mobile communications pose fundamental challenges to societies across the world.” There’s a fair case for that, he argues - but a case with much more alarming implications. ![]() It’s a highly private, encrypted messaging service with no algorithmic interference, and it’s still fertile ground for false narratives. The film doesn’t mention, however, that WhatsApp works almost nothing like Facebook. The film briefly mentions, for instance, that Facebook-owned WhatsApp has spread misinformation that inspired grotesque lynchings in India. Propaganda, bullying, and misinformation are actually far bigger and more complicated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |